At first blush, the blatant manner in which most hedge fund managers have thumbed their collective noses at the prospect of marketing their funds under the umbrella of new laws and regulations allowing general solicitation may seem, well … a trifle backward. However, when these hedge fund managers drill deeper, most conclude that marketing under the new rules offers little in the way of return on investment.

No New Demographics

Not only does lifting the ban on general solicitation fail to add a single new prospect to the mix, it threatens to redefine, in a stricter way, the qualifications investors must meet. In short, what was briefly perceived as a marketing tool with a potential to expand the client base, is now increasingly viewed as yet another minefield of regulation.

Public Perception

Fund managers are also circumspect with regard to public perception. After all, does a respected, trusted and successful hedge fund need to advertise? More to the point, would advertising detract from, rather than enhance a hedge fund’s image? Online universities and community colleges advertise—Harvard and Yale do not. These are the questions that most hedge fund managers are asking. To date, the answers overwhelmingly seem to favor restraint.

Advertising: Is it Worth the Aggravation?

Hedge funds have been attracting investors for decades without benefit of a public marketing campaign. In the decades since the Securities Act of 1933 imposed the ban on general solicitation, the hedge fund industry has grown to $2.82 trillion in assets under management … a sum projected to double by 2018, sans the benefit of traditional advertising. In fact, hedge funds’ assets under management have grown 7 percent through the first three quarters of 2014.

Absent a compelling argument, hedge fund managers will find it difficult to make a case for assuming the financial and regulatory burden that advertising would necessarily bring to pass. Consider the one hundred and eighty-five page document published by the SEC in conjunction with the new rule. This publication details provisions that must be adhered to by any hedge fund or other affected entity. Compounding this aggravation is the current debate raging over revisions in the definition of an accredited investor. Until this definition is fully vetted and blessed by the SEC, only the boldest and most foolhardy hedge fund manager would venture into these churning waters.

Risk versus Reward

At this point in the evolution of hedge fund marketing, the smart move seems to be one of sitting on the sidelines—waiting for the dust to settle. Existing marketing strategies, evolved over the past 8 decades, are serving the industry well, as evidenced by the nine consecutive quarters of growth in assets under management that hedge funds have enjoyed.

Hedge funds have already succeeded in carving out a unique niche in the investment community. Risking the loss of its current standing in the hearts and minds of individual investors and investing entities must necessarily be driven by something far more compelling than lifting a ban on advertising to those the industry already counts among its clients.



Hedge funds have long been the funambulists and contortionists of the circus that we call the financial sector. It was not so long ago that hedge funds pushed into real estate, purchasing thousands of single family homes in selected markets. Recently, the hedge fund industry has, once again, revealed its nimble nature by investing in entrepreneurial enterprises.

Does Venture Capital Have a Border Issue?

Not yet, but any imagined boundary between venture capital and hedge funds is blurring. While hedge funds have dabbled in start-up funding for the past decade or more, the practice seems to be gaining real momentum.

One significant example of this trend lies with Coatue Management’s $50 million funding round for Snapchat. Coatue also invested in the mobile travel start-up Hotel Tonite, and Box, a cloud storage and file sharing start-up. To the chagrin of venture capitalists, this San Francisco-based hedge fund is only one of several instances of this phenomenon.

Valiant Capital Partners and Maverick Capital are additional firms to have crossed over. Valiant Capital Partners invested in Dropbox, Evernote and Pinterest, while Maverick made seed investments in Zenefits and Estimote, establishing the fact that hedge funds are true players.

While venture capitalists are understandably intimidated, the facts would indicate they have little to fear from hedge funds. Venture capital has extended funding to the tune of $30 billion in the first three quarters of 2014, exceeding its funding levels for all of 2013.

Good for Entrepreneurs But What About the Hedge Fund Firms?

Cash for equity investments offer hedge fund firms extraordinary opportunities for colossal profits. Consider for a moment the gains reaped from Instagram’s sale to Facebook for $1 billion.

Although the tech sector has been held in some disregard by hedge funds, as a result of the dot com bubble burst in 2000, the teeter is starting to totter in their favor of late. A major contributing factor is that most tech companies are demonstrating greater restraint than in the past, waiting for revenue run rates in excess of $100 million and establishing a track record of global growth before going public—think Facebook and Twitter.

This level of patience has reduced the perceived level of risk for many hedge funds. More to the point, hedge funds are not the doting, nurturing and supportive investor that many early stage companies require. This makes hedge funds palatable investors for well-grounded companies in the growth stage.

Hedge Funds Offer Greater Flexibility

While hedge funds take a back-seat to venture capital in terms of support, they are more flexible in what they deem an acceptable return on investment. VCs, in the main, seek a much higher rate of return than their hedge fund counterparts.

As a result, hedge funds are carving out a niche by offering higher valuations and accepting lower returns than their venture capital firms are typically willing to accept. Let’s be clear, an investment that brings returns into the double-digits is very attractive to hedge funds accustomed to gains in single digits.

The real winners in this hedge fund intrusion are the tech start-ups and their founders. Fresh sources of capital are always welcome and hedge funds, at least for the moment, seem to be that source.


{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Finders Are Keepers and the Swiss Are Weepers

November 9, 2014

Joseph B. Galbraith, former principal of Florida hedge fund Galbraith Capital Investment Management Corp., has made the rogue’s list, subsequent to his apparent refusal to return $1.483 million mistakenly deposited in one of his firm’s accounts by an arguably incompetent Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC. The aggregate $1.483 million consisted of three wire-transfers made to an [...]

read more…

2014 Hedge Fund Compensation Survey is Closing

November 6, 2014

Hundreds of hedge fund professionals have participated, representing well-known firms and niche players, spanning the full range of experience and roles, including analysts, traders, marketing professionals, portfolio managers and others. The Hedge Fund Compensation Survey is closing soon. Click here to take the survey The 2014 Hedge Fund Compensation Survey takes less than 5 minutes [...]

read more…

A New Threat to Small Hedge Funds and the Less Affluent Investor

October 27, 2014

A debate brews between the U.S. Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the hedge fund industry about proposed changes to the current definition of accredited investor. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act requires this definition be reviewed every four years. The definition of an accredited investor has not changed since 1982, except [...]

read more…

Doors Opening – Doors Closing – the CalPERS Redemption

October 14, 2014

Every action has consequences. The CalPERS divestiture will have some unanticipated consequences as well. Here are a few. Doors that May Have Closed Two and twenty was already on the rails and headed out of town before the CalPERS announcement. One of the industry’s worst kept secrets is that most large pension funds and institutional [...]

read more…

CalPERS: Why All the Fuss?

September 28, 2014

Much has been made of California Public Employees’ Retirement System’s (CalPERS) decision to redeem some $4 billion of its assets from hedge fund investments. However, less is made of the fact that CalPERS manages some $300 billion in funds. This means that CalPERS had slightly more than 1% of its assets under management invested in [...]

read more…

Discount Hedge Funds – Is This the Wave of the Future?

September 14, 2014

Even ardent defenders of hedge fund fee structures must acknowledge the impact a marketplace open to retail investors may have on the status quo. Is the hedge fund 2 and 20 rule going the way of the banking industry’s 3-6-3 rule? Disruption It is no revelation that 2 and 20 has been under assault for [...]

read more…

Argentina – Victim or Victimizer

August 31, 2014

The retail credit universe is dominated by the FICO score. A consumer with a low FICO score will pay higher interest rates or suffer rejected credit requests. Similarly, a nation’s borrowing power is governed by scores from rating agencies. Moody’s, Standard and Poor’s, and Fitch are major players. High ratings make it possible for governments [...]

read more…

First: Do No Harm

August 17, 2014

There are equivalencies that can be drawn between the physician’s Hippocratic Oath to patients, and the hedge fund’s primary responsibility to its clientele. Just as the physician pledges to do no harm, the hedge fund manager has a similar charge with respect to preserving the investor’s capital. Don’t lose any principal! Of course, along with [...]

read more…