The number of start-up hedge funds in the US has steadily increased as investors are willing to put their money into such funds. However, only a few of these funds make it beyond their first year of operations.

As the industry matures and these new start-up hedge funds learn from previous experiences, the number of viable funds is also on the rise.

According to Phillip Chapple, executive director at KB Associates, investors can be lured to invest in a fund through reduced fees.

The Need for Hedge Fund Services

As the demand for start-up funds is constantly increasing, there has also been a growth in hedge fund consultancy services that provide assistance to these fund managers. As a result, the managers are beginning to understand their target market and more early funds are becoming viable. To become viable, a fund must offer investors a unique selling point.

These firms face high start-up costs, in the form of legal fees, compliance and registration with the relevant capital authorities. The industry’s current demand and supply of funds also does not justify launches of many new funds. But financial institutions are beginning to focus their attention towards smaller fund managers.

Lower the Fees

Capital is attracted to the start-up hedge fund through discounted management fees. Start-up hedge funds need to closely study the market trends and the habits of investors before entering the market. Based on the market conditions, it is preferable to adopt macro hedge funds, while European credit funds may also gain popularity as the financial crisis in the zone deepens.

Today, some of the start-up hedge funds are being set up with as little as $5 million. Before the financial crisis, an average start-up hedge fund was set up with an estimated $50 million. Even though there is a lack of early stage investors, seeders open up such funds with the intention of putting capital to work.

Raising Funds and Critical Mass

Start-up hedge funds may have to face a difficult asset raising environment as they are being launched in the market with fewer assets. Another problem is how smaller managers should handle investor requirements to have multiple prime brokers. Start-up hedge funds should not choose to have more than one prime broker till the size of fund grows to $75 million to $100 million.

At the same time, investors perceive larger funds to be more secure. In addition, smaller size of the fund restricts the amount of capital an institutional investor can commit to the fund. As the investor interest is limited, these start-up hedge funds are benefited by seeders and family offices. Start-up hedge funds may also face difficulty in complying with the new Form PF requirements brought into effect by Dodd-Frank law.

Isometric Investment Advisors Ltd, an Asia-focused hedge fund, was forced to wind up after its largest start up investor withdrew cash from it. Some key early-stage investors typically include funds of funds. As the sector faces immense challenges in raising capital from key investors, start-up hedge funds have been unable to move up the ladder and achieve a critical mass.

Without this critical mass, these start-up hedge funds may not achieve momentum and attract capital to grow.

{ 0 comments }

You could run a hedge fund from your laptop. The way things are going, you’ll probably be able to run one from your phone soon.

But it’ll be a long time before that becomes a good idea.

The main thing investors are concerned about is returns. Still, assuming that there are others in your niche whose alpha is as high as yours, you need to assure them that your risk of outage due to technological failure is lower than the next fund’s.

Hedge fund marketing means, in part, ensuring that your information technology infrastructure is robust. And it really goes beyond marketing; there are regulatory concerns surrounding the viability of order entry, trading, portfolio management, email and other critical functions. Dodd-Frank mandates that investors rely on firms that run their IT according to “best practices”. This typically means leaving the data center operations to the pros.

Whether you call them service providers or outsourcers or co-los or “the cloud,” your data and applications have to live somewhere besides your Dell. The definition of “best practices” is left to the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Their new guideline, Standards for Attestation Engagements (SSAE) 16, offers structure for auditing these service providers in terms of their physical security, data security, processes and procedures. SSAE 16 replaces the old Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS) 70, which coincided with Sarbanes-Oxley.

A fledgling hedge fund partnership “could start with Google apps and email,” according to Bob Guilbert, managing director of Boston-based IT outsource service EZE Castle Integration,  “but may find it difficult to attractive capital from anyone besides friends and family as they grow.”

“The due diligence operations guys have more power than they used to. They now have veto power,” says Paul Chain, president of AIS Fund Administration in Hackensack, N.J. Your IT “won’t win you the business, but it could lose you the business.”

It’s hard to say how much you need to spend on IT as a proportion of assets under management or of fees. The ratio is sure to differ from someone starting a hedge fund and someone managing an established hedge fund. There’s also a distinction to be made between the usual long-short equity fund and a manager who’s trying to finesse a more arcane investment strategy. Still, “hedge funds are very aggressive in terms of using IT,” says Guilbert, whose firm’s typical customer in the industry has more than $100 million AUM run by 12 to15 employees. “Technology is a key differentiator.”

You don’t need to be big to be differentiated, though, providing that you’re willing to ante up the basic table stakes.

“There is a bare minimum needed,” cautions Alex Chapman, Toronto-based managing director for Apex Fund Services, headquartered in Bermuda. “A system should allow [managers] to know what their position is on a daily basis, know what trades have been executed and matched and can be borrowed against.”

And all this probably involves a little more time, effort and expense than you think.

People starting a hedge fund “sometimes don’t realize all the boxes they have to check,” according to Chapman.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Hedge Funds Marketing Effectively to Institutions

February 6, 2012

Despite a dismal year for performance and continued attacks on hedge funds in the media, the industry stills seems to be doing a good job at marketing and attracting money from big institutional investors. First, there’s a survey from hedge fund service provider SEI that shows 38% of institutional investors plan to invest more money [...]

read more…

Promising Hedge Fund Strategies for 2012

January 30, 2012

Hedge fund managers speaking at the Gaim USA 2012 conference in Boca Raton, Florida, this past week identified two of the most promising hedge fund strategies and sources of alpha for 2012. Hedge fund managers are already licking their chops over the potential of distressed debt investments in Europe, as the continent’s banks struggle to strengthen [...]

read more…

Two Hedge Fund Strategies Picking Up the Slack

January 23, 2012

There are a few bright spots as hedge fund managers come off a dismal year for hedge fund performance. Two hedge fund strategies are showing the biggest inflow from investors looking to cash in on volatility. Discretionary and systematic macro funds, which actively trade across all asset classes, showed a net inflow of $7.9 billion [...]

read more…

Headwinds Faced by Hedge Fund Marketers

January 16, 2012

Not only did several high-profile hedge fund managers such as John Paulson have a tough year in 2011, it now appears that performance data for the entire industry is being called into question. Research indicates that the aggregate data used by hedge funds to justify their performance edge has been systematically inflated or manipulated, writes [...]

read more…

Could 2012 Be a Better Year for Hedge Fund Startups?

January 9, 2012

During the financial crisis, investors flocked to the safe haven of big, well-established hedge funds. But the lackluster returns of some of these funds may have tempered the notion that bigger is better. Smaller funds and hedge fund start-ups offer a healthy premium to investors brave enough to take the leap, says Jeroen Tielman, CEO [...]

read more…

Hedge Fund Marketing Year in Review

January 2, 2012

It’s no secret that 2011 was a disappointing year for the hedge fund industry in terms of overall performance. Despite that, investor interest in alternative investments remains strong and the industry is not seeing the spike in redemptions that accompanied the 2008 crisis. Among the developments we covered in 2011, we watched as funds adjusted [...]

read more…

Hedge Fund Marketers Have Less to Fear in 2012

December 26, 2011

Although there are storm clouds on the horizon, including the Eurozone crisis, volatile markets, and a hangover from mediocre performance in 2011, hedge funds may have less to fear in 2012 says Donald A. Steinbrugge in a guest article for Opalesque. Steinbrugge is Managing Partner of Agecroft Partners, a global consulting and third party marketing [...]

read more…

Could Bridgewater Be Marketing to Family Wealth?

December 19, 2011

Could Ray Dalio’s Westport-based Bridgewater Associates be going after family wealth with his new All Weather Portfolio III fund? That’s the question raised in a Connecticut Post article recently. It’s a result of Bridgewater listing a bargain buy-in price of $100,000 in a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filing this past week. Some industry insiders [...]

read more…